The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trios taken by drivers in 2005.
The bar graph elucidates the percentage of reasons for taking a car trip by genders in 2005.
It is evident from the graph that, the work purpose was dominated by men drivers, with the percentage of over 50. The recreation purpose had the second highest place of around 11%. The highest purpose for the women drivers to take the car was for the work but less frequent than men drivers (around 40%) . Women drove the car very often, less than 20% of their times for the shopping. Courses purpose was recorded at around 14% for women drivers.
The rest of reasons were reached at below 10% of car usages in 2005. Bank and running errands took 10% of women time to drive the car whilst close to 0% of men spent their time on those purposes. Just below 10% of women drove the car to visit their friends compared to half of those for men. Visiting towns were most popular reasons among men drivers - 10% compared to 5% for women.
Both genders experienced the most of car used for the work. While the shopping dominated the reasons for women to use a car, most men drove the car for recreational purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-28 | Malita | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | mifas meleraroth | 73 | view |
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001 77
- The graph below shows the apparent consumption of pure alcohol, per capita from 1961 to 2014 in Australia 55
- Prevalence of current tobacco smoking (%) by region by sex, 2010 and 2025.AFRO (African Region)AMRO (American Region)EMRO (Eastern Mediterranean region)EURO (Europe Region)SEARO (South East Asia Region)WPRO (Western Pacific Region) 70
- Question is in the picture. 70
- The bar graph compares the amount of coffee and meat consumed each year by Norway, France, Germany, USA, Russia, China and Japan. 70
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.71 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 10
No. of Words: 201 200
No. of Characters: 865 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.765 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.303 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.154 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 16 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 8 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.71 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.426 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.641 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4