The bar graph compares the amount of coffee and meat consumed each year by Norway, France, Germany, USA, Russia, China and Japan.
The bar graphs elucidate the amount of coffee and meat consumption in seven countries.
It is evident from the graph; the coffee was the least popular among seven countries whereas the meat was the most popular among Western countries (USA, France, Norway and Germany).
The amount of 122 kg of meat was consumed by USA citizens as the most significant compared to other countries. European countries showed the next highest meat consumption in kilograms, with outstanding data from German people ate 87 kg of meats, followed by French of 72 kg and 60 kg per Norman person. Meat consumption in Russia and China recorded similar amount of 45 and 47 kg, respectively. The lowest meat consumption was Japanese as they consumed almost a third of those of Americans.
In contrast, Norman showed the outstanding coffee intake of 9 kg and German followed closely of 7 kg per person. About 5 kg per person, 4 kg per person and 5 kg per person of meat has consumed by French, American and Russian, respectively. Chinese drank the lowest amount of coffee of 2 kg per Chinese people as observed from the graph.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-06-17 | Madhu081191aluri | 56 | view |
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 43
- The bar chart below shows figures of annual coffee and meat consumption 56
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of th 70
- The graph below shows the apparent consumption of pure alcohol, per capita from 1961 to 2014 in Australia 55
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 70
wrong:
was the most popular/significant
correct:
was the most popular/significant thing (people, products...)
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 190 200
No. of Characters: 886 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.713 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.663 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.626 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.279 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.483 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.712 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.172 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4