The bar graph compares the amount of coffee and meat consumed each year by Norway, France, Germany, USA, Russia, China and Japan.
The bar graphs elucidate the amount of coffee and meat consumption in seven countries.
It is evident from the graph; the coffee was the least popular among seven countries whereas the meat was the most popular among Western countries (USA, France, Norway and Germany).
The amount of 122 kg of meat was consumed by USA citizens as the most significant compared to other countries. European countries showed the next highest meat consumption in kilograms, with outstanding data from German people ate 87 kg of meats, followed by French of 72 kg and 60 kg per Norman person. Meat consumption in Russia and China recorded similar amount of 45 and 47 kg, respectively. The lowest meat consumption was Japanese as they consumed almost a third of those of Americans.
In contrast, Norman showed the outstanding coffee intake of 9 kg and German followed closely of 7 kg per person. About 5 kg per person, 4 kg per person and 5 kg per person of meat has consumed by French, American and Russian, respectively. Chinese drank the lowest amount of coffee of 2 kg per Chinese people as observed from the graph.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-06-17 | Madhu081191aluri | 56 | view |
- The graph shows the worldwide market of the mobile phone market for sales in the years 2009 and 2013. 80
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? 60
- As the number of private cars has increased, so too has the level of pollution in many cities. What can be done to tackle this increasingly common problem? 47
- Most of today's social urgent problems can only be solved by international cooperation. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 71
wrong:
was the most popular/significant
correct:
was the most popular/significant thing (people, products...)
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 190 200
No. of Characters: 886 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.713 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.663 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.626 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.279 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.483 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.712 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.172 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4