The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The charts illustrate consumption of junk foods from 1970 to 1990 that are evidence by three levels of income people in the last period.
In 1990, mostly people, having over average income, spent more than 30 pence a week to eat hamburger whereas this compared inversely, over a half of difference, than pizza in all of income level. Surprisingly, fish & chips eaten by some people in the contrast level, high income and low income, had same amount approximately 16 pence.
As can be seen, popularity of fish & chips and hamburger showed an upward trend since the beginning of period, while fish & chips rose more significantly about 500 pieces sold in 1990. Otherwise, consumption of pizza showed a downward record, started just over 300, although it grew slightly in the middle of 1980’s.
Overall, hamburger and fish & chips were favored commonly people than pizza. Logically, both of them were also having good track for 20 years ago.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gulbakhyt_90 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | dhavaljo15 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | AnneDao | 78 | view |
from 1970 to 1990 that are evidence by three levels of income people in the last period.
from 1970 to 1990 that are in evidence by three levels of income people in the last period.
whereas this compared inversely
whereas this is compared inversely
Surprisingly, fish & chips eaten by some people in the contrast level,
Surprisingly, fish & chips are eaten by some people in the contrast level,
hamburger and fish & chips were favored commonly people than pizza.
hamburger and fish & chips were favored commonly by people than pizza.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 156 200
No. of Characters: 750 1000
No. of Different Words: 104 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.534 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.808 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.439 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 51 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 27 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.851 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.46 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.776 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.135 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4