The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The chart is given information about the way in which money spent on food items in Britain country. Moreover, graph shows the trends how much consumed the fast food items.
Overall, higher-income person opted to hamburger while, middle and below middle preferred to fish & chips stuff. In order to consumption fish & chips upward tradition, however, pizza downward tradition.
In the chart to begin with higher-income people usually spent money on the hamburger of 45 pounds, While average and below-average spent 35 and 15 pounds respectively. Surprisingly, the scenario changed middle income people per week spending money on fish & chips soundly 35 pounds, however, below average and higher-income people pounds 18 and 15 respectively. Pizza stuff for higher, middle and lower pounds 18,15 and only 5 respectively.
In the graph form year 1970 pizza was the upward tradition threefold times while fish& chips 100 times and a hamburger just started. After the years 1975 to 1980 suddenly hamburger and fish& chips items gradually increased 100 and 150 times. From the years 1985 to 1990 fish& chips reached peak of fivefold times however pizza declined at 200 times but hamburger consumed 300 times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gulbakhyt_90 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | dhavaljo15 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | AnneDao | 78 | view |
- airport visitors 56
- cement production 61
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 56
- Today, many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on outdoor sports. Why, is it a positive or negative development. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.*includes French, German and Spanish 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, While average and below-average spent 35 and 15 pounds respectively. Surprisin...
^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 18 and 15 respectively. Pizza stuff for higher, middle and lower pounds 18,15 an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32460732984 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71373517367 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2302296528 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.7 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187788551701 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818716942566 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101236228761 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136039412007 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149044792202 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.