the table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela,1999.
The table compares the data of the number of people in various age groups who are the victims of 5 crimes in Venezuela in 1999. It can be obviously seen that robbery has taken the first place among others.
The highest number of victims aged in 8-14 is in the robbery at 4558. The second place is taken by the victims who are over 25 and under 44 years old in this category. In contrast, in age of over 65, the amount of vulnerable people declines. In comparison with robbery, the numbers are lower in negligence with 54 victims. There are not any victims aged in between 25 and 44 in this group. The highest number belongs to those people age of 8-14. The total numbers of victims in blackmail and kidnapping are close, at 223 and 233 respectively.
To sum up, the highest total number is in robbery whereas negligence makes it down.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-07-16 | chimdaivotan | 78 | view |
2014-05-05 | Dark_horse | 80 | view |
- car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past three years that many cities in the world are now one big jam.how true do you think this statement is?what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 50
- Many young people leaving school think that going to university will give them higher wages, superior career prospects and greater job satisfaction. However, they would do better to get a job and start earning as soon as possible.Do you agree or disagree? 65
- the table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela,1999. 80
- Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos. Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 85
- the table below shows how young people in Tokyo and Japan listened to music over the previous month. The pie chart shows a record company's international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music 66
flaws:
No. of Words: 154 200
More content, higher marks.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 154 200
No. of Characters: 664 1000
No. of Different Words: 83 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.523 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.312 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.292 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 13 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 9 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.005 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.394 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.548 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.029 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4