Annual rice production
The given bar chart provides a comparison of the amount of rice production in 4 different countries between the years 1995, 2005, and 2015.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the amount of rice production in city A and city D saw an upward trend, while the opposite was true for city B. Furthermore, the number of rice production in city C remained unchanged over the period.
Looking at the chart for more details, at the beginning of the period, the number of rice production in city A, was the highest, at about 45 million tonnes. Then, it saw an increase to around 48 million tonnes in 2005 and reaching a peak at precisely 50 million tonnes in 2015. The figures for that in city B were lower, at about 35 million tonnes in 1995, then it increased to over 40 million tonnes in the next 10 years and it declined to around 42 million tonnes at the end of the period.
For the rest of the chart, in 1995, the amount of rice produced in city C stood at around 4 million tonnes, and the figure for city D stood at 3 million tonnes. There was a slightly rise in the amount of rice produced in city C in 2005 and it doubled the figure for city D, at around 6 million tonnes and 3 million tonnes, respectively. Additionally, the amount of rice produced in city C shared the same information with city D, at 4 million tonnes in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buying a ticket and going to the cinema In the near future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Percentage of households with electrical appliances
- How sugar is produced from sugar cane
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...in 2015. The figures for that in city B were lower, at about 35 million tonnes in 19...
^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...illion tonnes at the end of the period. For the rest of the chart, in 1995, the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
... D stood at 3 million tonnes. There was a slightly rise in the amount of rice produced in city ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35177865613 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52322555223 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403162055336 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.1188916208 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148165288742 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103157098016 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080111112172 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135925784643 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692774581708 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.