The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010
Given is the graph illustrating the comparison of water consumption in four different countries around 2010.
It is clear that the water spent on agriculture in China was the dominant choice compared to other countries. By contrast, using for industrial purpose in Australia was the category receiving the least proportion.
In 2010, water was mainly focused on agriculture. To be specific, China was the country having the highest consumption, at 84%, while the figure occurring in the USA, Russia, and Australia was significantly lower, at 39%, 30% and 35% respectively. In terms of industrial water use, there was a mere minority percentage of 8% and 4% in China and Australia. Meanwhile, 42% was the percentage of water use in the USA and highly consumption (60%) was Russia.
As for domestic usage, China made up 9%, which was lower than the rest countries. However, spending on this item in Australia was the highest of the total group, at 61%.
- The diagram below shows the results of a questionnaire showing how many times teenagers in Australia use an iPod in a week to play videos in 2009 68
- The chart below shows average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities. 84
- the bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010. 73
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1983, and the prices of black and white television and colour television during the same period. 80
- The table shows the average annual percentages of water pollution in four large cities in 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06329113924 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92520115455 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4268009867 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233939754332 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111612101821 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535193575676 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131895999676 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702593901663 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.