The bar chart below illustrates five different industries’ percentage share of Country B’s economy in 1995 and 2015 with a forecast for 2025.
The bar chart demonstrates the actual and projected proportion of the economy of Country B held by the five major economic sectors.
Overall, Finance, Food processing, and Fossil fuels are the three industries that increased marginally from 1995 to 2015. Additionally, in 2025, Finance is expected to be the most important fabrication, whereas the Manufacturing corporation is predicted to experience a significant decrease.
Looking closely at the bar chart, an upward trend was seen in the percentage of Financial business from over 30% to 35% in the first 10-year period, and this figure is forecast to reach the highest point of nealy 43% in 2025. By contrast, Manufacturing witnessed a drop in porportion from roughly 21% to 16% and is likely to see a sharp fall of around 5% for that period.
According to the fluctuation for percentage in toursim, there was a slight decline from about 25% to 20% in 2015, and this number is expected to remain unchanged in 2025. On the contrary, both Food processing and Tourism industry surged gradually to more than 20% and 30% in 2015 respectively. These numbers are suggested to return to 2009 levels at around 10% and 25% in2025 respectively.
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015
- The table illustrates the all time top Olympics medals in several sports and the line graph depicts the number of rewards earned by five different countries in all Olympics 84
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 73
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- In some countries around the world the government makes higher education free for everyone Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0303030303 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97971237679 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641414141414 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6853751474 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243039263082 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882339889145 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627754917091 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134187521143 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410469551795 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.