The bar chart below illustrates five different industries’ percentage share of Brazil’s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph shows how five different industries of Brazil’s economy have been displayed as a percentage from 2009 to 2019 with a forecast for 2029.
Overall, there is a decline in the proportion of food processing, manufacturing, tourism and coil, coal and gas, with the share of manufacturing witnessing the most dramatic drop. While the figure for the finance seen to have a significant rise and also be the one which has the highest percentage throughout the period.
30% of Brazil’s economy was for finance in 2009, with a subsequent considerable increase to 35% in 2019, and the final is likely to reach 40% in 2029. Conversely, the figure for manufacturing was just over 20% in 2009, followed by a progressive decrease to 15% in 2019 and is expected to suffer a big drop in 2029, with just hovering around 5%.
The proportion for food processing and coil, coal and gas seem to have a similar fluctuation, which starts at 10% and 25% in 2009, after which it experienced a growth to 20% and 30% in 2019, before being predicted to end the period at the figure which seem to be the same in 2009. Meanwhile, the percentage for tourism have the opposite changes, dropping from 25% in 2009 to approximately 20% in 2019 and having an anticipation to remain stable in 2029.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-24 | minhhh123 | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | huynh truc mai | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 81 | view |
- The bar chart below illustrates five different industries percentage share of Brazil s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 73
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74107142857 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87858859885 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526785714286 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8373617559 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.714285714 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257917886618 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138249322217 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114207820164 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189628488184 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12517594535 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.