The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations
The bar chart illustrates the investment in machinery, building, staff training and research in five different organizations.
In general, Organization B spends the highest budget on these categories while the opposite is true for Organization D and Organization E.
Staff training is reported to be invested heavily by organization B, at nearly 1,85 billion euros whereas figures in organization A and C are relatively lower, at 1,2 billion euros and 0,8 billion euros respectively. Regarding research, organization A stilled ranks its first position at 1,6 billion euros, followed by about 1,3 billion euros in organization C and nearly 1,1 billion euros in organization A. Meanwhile, the expenditure on building in organization A exceeds that of organization B and organization C with the respective figures being 1,5 billion euros, 1,4 billion euros and 1,1 billion euros. In organization C, the largest investment is in machinery, at 1,1 billion euros, which is higher than that of organization A and organization B, at a billion euros and 0.9 billion euros correspondently.
Both organization D and organization E spend the largest amount of money on building with the same number, at 1 billion euros. In terms of machinery, 0.9 billion euros is invested in organization D as opposed to 0.8 billion euros in organization E. By contrast, organization E experiences the higher amount of money in staff training and research with the respective figures being 0.9 billion euros and 0.7 billion euros than those in organization D, which are 0.7 billion euros in staff training and 0,6 billion euros in research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-11 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfont area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 67
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, still, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 3.97073170732 579% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29571984436 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32658655989 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.408560311284 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4791099907 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.222222222 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181496171782 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122540815563 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437470901108 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154188589016 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346355825258 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.