The bar chart below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001. (16/7/2020)
The proportion of families with cars in a particular European country in a 30-year period beginning in 1971 is depicted in the bar chart.
From an overall perspective, the ratio of households without cars witnessed a downward trend whilst that of one car followed a contrasting movement. In addition, the percentage of 2-car occupants fluctuated relatively wildly throughout the given period.
From a quick glance at the chart, in 1971, families with no car contributed the most appreciable portion to the sample, at above 45%, which was radically higher compared to that of one and two cars, with 35% and over 15% respectively. The year 1981 followed the same pattern in this statistical report but the gap was more narrow.
Moving on to analyse the remaining years of the chart, it is immediately obvious that there was an explosion in the proportion of one-car households in 1991 of more than 15% to a peak at over 45%, equal to that of without cars in 1971. In contrast, the figure for the remaining categories dropped considerably. Finally, in 2001, the proportion of one-car and car-free families decreased minimally to over 40% and 25% correspondingly, while that of two cars increased tremendously to the same statistics as households with no cars.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-20 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 61
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 78
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting anf reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07655502392 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01193796997 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569377990431 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1018616738 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.625 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295366435489 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123629080274 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891861693287 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191719486751 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631086483835 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.