The bar chart below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001. (16/7/2020)
The proportion of families with cars in a particular European country in a 30-year period beginning in 1971 is depicted in the bar chart.
From an overall perspective, the ratio of households without cars witnessed a downward trend whilst that of one car followed a contrasting movement. In addition, the percentage of 2-car occupants fluctuated relatively wildly throughout the given period.
From a quick glance at the chart, in 1971, families with no car contributed the most appreciable portion to the sample, at above 45%, which was radically higher compared to that of one and two cars, with 35% and over 15% respectively. The year 1981 followed the same pattern in this statistical report but the gap was more narrow.
Moving on to analyse the remaining years of the chart, it is immediately obvious that there was an explosion in the proportion of one-car households in 1991 of more than 15% to a peak at over 45%, equal to that of without cars in 1971. In contrast, the figure for the remaining categories dropped considerably. Finally, in 2001, the proportion of one-car and car-free families decreased minimally to over 40% and 25% correspondingly, while that of two cars increased tremendously to the same statistics as households with no cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-20 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 84
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 content com android chrome FileProvider images screenshot 1629221490316151501759 jpg 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07655502392 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01193796997 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569377990431 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1018616738 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.625 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295366435489 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123629080274 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891861693287 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191719486751 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631086483835 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.