The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they were on holiday in 2012.
This bar chart illustrates the holiday accommodation chosen by people in the United Kingdom in 2012.
It is clear that hotel was the most popular accommodation in four nations. Additionally, self-catering was the second common type chosen in these places except Northern Ireland.
Regarding hotel and self-catering, the percentage of people living in England selecting hotel when they went on holiday was nearly 55%, while the figure for Scotland was slightly lower, about 52%. Meanwhile, the Scottish and the Welsh staying hotel accounted for nearly 50% and roughly 45% of their total populations, respectively. The proportion of individuals in Wales choosing self-catering is at 30%. This figure was nearly three times higher than that of Nothern Ireland, just over 10%.
Turning to caravan and camping, the proportion of the people in Northern Ireland staying in caravan is highest, just over 30%, while the figure for Scotland was lowest, about 6%. In comparison, inhabitants in Scotland choosing camping when travelling made up just around 7% of its total population, compared to over 10% of three other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | IVANTRUONG | 92 | view |
- students mastering a second languages in 6 nations 67
- the diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 84
- The bar chart compares the rates of students in different nations in terms of learning a foreign language in year 2000. 73
- choosing the different kinds of accommodation 78
- More big shopping malls are being built and replace small shops Is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to camp'.
Suggestion: to camp
...rison, inhabitants in Scotland choosing camping when travelling made up just around 7% ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40659340659 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90340817182 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6348484585 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144121768534 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601468214273 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873213860362 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113621958362 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104575388476 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.