The bar chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the last year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar diagram illustrates the data about the percentage of the rate of illiteracy of males and females in six different regions including Developed Countries, Latin America, East Asia, Sub-Sahara Africa, Arab States, and South Asia for the last year.
Overall, it can be obtained that women are more illiterate than men in all regions. The majority of women in the Arab States and South Asia are not educated whereas South Asia has the largest uneducated females. While most of the regions exhibit huge distinct illiteracy rates among men and women, Developed Countries and Latin America have the lowest differences.
Examining the dataset of males in more detail, it is clear that South Asia has the largest number of uneducated men, which is approximately 35%. Arab States and Sub-Saharan Africa have almost equal percentages of illiteracy males, that is 28% and 31% respectively. East Asia (8%), Latin America (10%), and Developed Countries (1%) have a minority of uneducated men whereas the Developed Countries have the lowest percentage among all regions.
Turning the dataset for females, it is evident that the Arab States and South Asia have the majority of women who are illiterate, which is 55% and 52%, whereas South Asia has the highest percentage of illiterate women community that is highest among all data in the graph. On the other side, Developed Countries displayed an excellent rate of women who are not educated, which is 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | Zahid6400 | 11 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | neverlandforestcat | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | nunu | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | Shinycorn122 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | thaonguyen1612 | 73 | view |
- The graphs below show the different reasons of two groups of students to choose Dorrifod University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 78
- The graph below shows a conference hall built in 1981 and planned for 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The three pie charts below show the coffee production and consumption of coffee and where the profit goes around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The proper name in singular (America) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
..., Developed Countries and Latin America have the lowest differences. Examining the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The proper name in singular (Asia) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ent that the Arab States and South Asia have the majority of women who are illiterat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10924369748 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65076437979 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8105428699 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.111111111 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0703583048516 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03399434324 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471097108079 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585796624232 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525640857886 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.