The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This bar chart illustrates the numbers (in thousands) of students who chose a certain university with eight subjects (Sciences, Mathematics, Social Sciences, Languages, Humanities, The Arts, Literature, Law) in 2005.
Overall, the chart groups students according to subjects and divides these subjects groups into male and female categories. There here are some foolproof differences on subjects chosen between the two genders.
Around twenty-four thousand females chose social sciences higher than the males at about fourteen thousand. Moreover, social science is also the subject with the highest total number of choices compared to other subjects. There were approximately eighteen thousand girls and two thousand boys in Languages, making it the least popular subject overall (two thousand). The number of boys enrolled in sciences was over twenty thousand, which was roughly twice as many as the number of females at around ten thousand. As for Mathematics, females stood at four thousand, which was nowhere near as close as males with eighteen thousand.
On the other hand, the remaining subjects for both genders were not as popular, Humanities, The Arts, Literature, Law. Fifteen thousand males chose literature, compared to twelve thousand females. In Humanities, the net figure was the same for both sexes at twelve thousand each. Arts were mostly dominated by females with nine thousand vs three thousand (males), whereas the law was dominated by males with ten thousand vs six thousand (females).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-22 | Vũ Hải Đăng | view | |
| 2022-03-13 | Trần Lê Khải | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | khanhvy5933 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | namb2113068@student.ctu.edu.vn | view | |
| 2022-03-10 | dinhngoclanquyen | 89 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, whereas, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03056768559 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59726596779 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554585152838 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6064230625 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124203120484 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559923809488 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706725214831 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114185578395 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938011418767 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, whereas, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03056768559 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59726596779 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554585152838 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6064230625 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124203120484 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559923809488 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706725214831 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114185578395 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938011418767 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.