The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005
The bar given illustrates that the proportion of expenditure the government expended on transportation in four countries, namely Italy, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United Stated America over the course of 15 years from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the amount of money used for infrastructure had a downward trend in Portugal while the other countries saw an increase in spending on daily community vehicles.
In 1990, Portugal provided the largest amount of money on infrastructure out of 4 countries, about 27%, while Italy used more than 20% of their expenditures to upgrade and expand public provision. At this point, stood at 10% of the UK revenue paid the down payment the least into the road and transport. The US spent slightly more than the UK, approximately 12%.
As for the fund on transport infrastructure, there was a significant fluctuation in investment in Italy, the UK and the USA over the 15 years, about 23%, 12 %, and 13% respectively. Subsequently, the spending of Italy and the UK fall considerably, about 5%. The USA was the only country that funded extra, where its percentage rose up to 15%.
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The following two pie charts show the results of the survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among adults in 1985 and 1995 78
- THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE WHO OWN THE DEVICES FROM 2010 TO 2025 92
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph shows data for annual sales revenue or turnover for three outdoor clothing companies from 2004 and 2014. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01604278075 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06790878001 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4834978214 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172911550894 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625901956721 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050075761509 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946401009231 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049271894331 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.