The diagram compares on the proportion of girls and boys who passed their high school competency tests from different subjects over a two year period from 2010.
It can be seen from the graph that the girls had the highest percentage of victory in computer science at a massive 56. 3% as opposed to a moderate 42. 1% of boys who passed in this exam. In contrast, turning to geography, more boys(30. 4%)cleared this subject than girls(20. 1%) counterpart. However, the figure for male students who passed in chemistry subject was exactly a half and that for female students within the given year. Interestingly, there were only an average 2% of differences had seen in both physics and history in both gender.
On the other hand, in terms of foreign languages and mathematics, there were no significant changes or differences between them in these subjects.
All in all, the percentage of exam results are remarkably higher in girls than in boys during this period in a typical school.
- Many people believe that it is important to protect the environment, but they make no effort to protect it themselves.Why do you think it is the case?What actions do you think that individuals can do to protect the environment? 84
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations.Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 67
- Benefits of using solar energy for residential purposes is necessary these days. Discuss 84
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of travelling there is an growing demand for more flights What problems does this have on the environment What measures could be taken to solve the problem 79
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The diagram compares on the proportion o...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts over a two year period from 2010. It can be seen from the graph that the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89285714286 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68221973766 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64880952381 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2275694271 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190289314718 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560873002664 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648016944587 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107293908106 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756448888146 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.