The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States,
Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.
A glance at the bar chart provided reveals the consumption of five major kinds include food, housing, transportation, health care, and clothing in four countries in the year 2009.
Overall, residents tended to spend money on housing in each country, the opposite was true on health care. Besides, the percentage of British paying for health services was the lowest in this period.
The figure for paying for houses in the United States made up at more than a quarter, in comparison with roughly 15% and 17% for food and transportation respectively. There were approximately 20% using on accommodation and vehicles in Canada, meanwhile, the proportion of food was reported only 15%. And the statistic of health care and clothing in Unites was nearly the same as the Canada rate with the exchanging of these two services, nearly 5% and 7% respectively.
On the other hand, the percentage of citizens in England using their income on housing, food, and transportation were roughly 25%, 20%, and 15% respectively. By contrast, the rate of health care in the United Kingdom stood at nearly under 2% which was half of the clothing in this country. In Japna, the proportion of food and house was the same, approximately more 20%, than doubled of transportation, and more 4 times as much as the figure of clothing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-08 | reverjae | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-08 | reverjae | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers 84
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 56
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- The table shows the percentage of students giving a good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99090909091 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94117253281 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.403616532 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158009855828 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637559432622 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630032728111 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990592788379 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651695081857 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.