The bar chart illustrates the statistics about households in owned and rented accommodation in UK from 1918 to 2011.
The bar chart illustrates the statistics about households in owned and rented accommodation in UK from 1918 to 2011. Overall, it is obvious that households in ownership rose gradually from its lowest point while the number of rented households went down from its highest between 1918 and 2001.
According to the chart, in 1939 the number of owned households grew from about 21% to above 30% and remained stable until 1953. After 8 years, the statistics of households in ownership saw a growth of 10% and again in the following two decades there was an upward trends of 20 %.Coming to the year of 1991, the percentage of owning households was under 70% nearly the same with the data in the sequence year in the row yet in 2011, the number had a decline of about 5%.
In accordance with the information given in the chart, in 1939 the number of households in hired accommodation decreased from about 78% to under 70% similarly with the indication of 1953. In the next year in the row, it was estimated that the percentage of renting a house was approximately 60%. In 20 years the number of rental households in Britain had a downward trend about 20% while it was constant showing 30% between 1991 and 2001. The percentage increased to about 37% at the end of the year in the row.
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 84
- Do you agree or disagree that women can work in governmental works 56
- The maps give information about an island which has experienced a constructional developments for its tourists 78
- People s shopping habits depend more on the age group they belong to than any other factors Do you agree or disagree 56
- The figures illustrate the statistics about usage of water in Oceania in the year of 2004 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt while the number of rented households went down from its highest between 1918 ...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Coming
...ades there was an upward trends of 20 %.Coming to the year of 1991, the percentage of ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iven in the chart, in 1939 the number of households in hired accommodation decrea...
^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on decreased from about 78% to under 70% similarly with the indication of 1953. ...
^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...under 70% similarly with the indication of 1953. In the next year in the row, i...
^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith the indication of 1953. In the next year in the row, it was estimated that t...
^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... renting a house was approximately 60%. In 20 years the number of rental household...
^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut 20% while it was constant showing 30% between 1991 and 2001. The percentage in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60698689956 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64001880317 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484716157205 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.2232963554 43.030603864 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.875 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438836241406 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235392776861 0.103423049105 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.295612504836 0.0843802449381 350% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340012336986 0.15604864568 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.205201428961 0.0819641961636 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.