Bar chart : Shares of expenditures for selected categories, United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Japan, 2009.
The figure elucidates the expenditure’s shares for several categories in United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Japan in 2009. At first glance, it is evident that in comparison with other sectors, housing had a higher number of shares of expenditures instead of others.
To begin with, housing approximately had the same percentages for all nations in 2009, between at just above a quarter and just over two-tenths. Nevertheless, food faced a difference scheme, over all, only Japan that succeeded to achieve at well across two-tenths, and other states roughly in between a fifth and just under fifteen in a hundred. However, In 2009, all states had the percentage of transportation aspect, which constituted in between two in ten and one in ten.
In contrast, health care and clothing witnessed a few number of expenditures in four countries. It is able to be seen that in health care, only United States that is able to finish at well beyond 10% and other nations are lower rather than United States, which accounted for just less than one-tenths. On the other hand, the number of shares of expenditures of Canada and United Kingdom, which was just above a tenth, is higher than United States and Japan, which made up at just below 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-02 | buihieu2705 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | alifdores | 73 | view |
- Line graph : channel one news viewing figures. 78
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 73
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside (2000 – 2009). 73
- The bar graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok. 95
- The bar chart shows the transport preferences among young people from different countries 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...t, health care and clothing witnessed a few number of expenditures in four countries. It i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96666666667 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84012790744 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4346589802 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29599955022 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150946709309 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176569728079 0.0843802449381 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241762036236 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150020465753 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.