The figure reveals British emigration to five countries from 2004 up to 2007. It is clearly seen that Britons preferred to go to Australia compared to the other countries.
Australia had the highest number of emigrating Britons from 2004 and three years later. It started with a little over 40,000 emigrants though it suffered a drawback a year later with 48,000 but it reached its peak on 2006 with 52,000. In 2007, it fell to 45,000 but it still remained to top place for British people to go to. The second destination preferred by Britons was Spain with 35,000 in 2004 but it fell to 27,000 in the last years.
The USA and France had a fluctuating pattern throughout the period. The USA started with 20,000 then it dropped to 19,000 and afterwards it rose again meeting the same numbers as it begun then it fell back to 20,000. The same happened to France who had 23,000 in 2004 and rocketed at 2005 with 35, 000 but declined on 2006 with almost 8,000 difference from the previous year and end with 19,000. Subsequently, New Zealand was the least preferred location among the 5 countries. At the first year it had 23,000 then it fell by almost 1,000 per year until it reached 20,000 by the last year.
- Life cycle and anatomy of a lady bird 73
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 56
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 61
- The bar chart shows British Emigration selected to destinations between 2004 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ctuating pattern throughout the period. The USA started with 20,000 then it dropped...
^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s it begun then it fell back to 20,000. The same happened to France who had 23,000 ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58986175115 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39029730463 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5051494747 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5454545455 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0600788631185 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367055381118 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499600036662 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680055139953 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450288683082 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.