The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by Bek on Thu, 08/24/2017 - 16:05

The bar graph illustrates the features of GDP - namely Information Technology and Service Industry - in the United Kingdom between 1992 and 2000 and is measured in percentages.

Overall it is immediately apparent both production went up over the 8-year period of time. However the former witnessed a more substantial upward trend than the latter.

At the beginning of the period, there was a slight diverse between industries by demonstrating 6 % and 4 % respectively. Similarly, the steady growth remained the static the following years. Consequently, in 1994, IT was just merely 2 % larger than Service. However, the during the next two years IT Industry rose minimally by almost 8 %, whilst the another one, in stark contrast, stayed unchangable by climbing. Although, the first four years saw a slow difference between them, while the last two years experienced a significant various in the aspects of GPD. In 1998, IT rose to 12 %, whereas the service accounted for almost three-quarters of that. Finally, it ended up by displaying the the first feature twice as much as the second part.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...both production went up over the 8-year period of time. However the former witnessed a more su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...went up over the 8-year period of time. However the former witnessed a more substantial...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...hat. Finally, it ended up by displaying the the first feature twice as much as the seco...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...hat. Finally, it ended up by displaying the the first feature twice as much as the seco...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, similarly, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20454545455 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00521608512 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693181818182 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1414862384 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0704972726299 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240608941379 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060539207081 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713931639744 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927887971759 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.