the bar chart shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.

The bar chart compares the worldwide sales of four types of electronic games over a period of seven years, starting from 2000 to 2006. Units are measured in billions of US dollars.

It can be seen that the sales for most of the digital games experienced an upward trend, except for console games. Handheld games had the highest number of sales throughout this period.

In 2000, the sales figure of handheld games was around 11 billion dollars, while console games were the second most popular platform with sales reaching just under 6 billion dollars. No figures were given for mobile or online games that year. In the period of seven years, the handheld games rose gradually to reach its peak at slightly under 18 billion dollars, whereas console games continued to drop to hit its lowest point of less than 3 billion dollars.

Global sales of online and mobile phone games followed a similar pattern. Even though, online games and mobile phone games appeared later in the global market later than the others but both sales numbers show a gradually increasing trend for the first 6 years. By the sixth year, sales revenues for both types of games were over 6 billion dollars.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, whereas, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85221674877 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16608777004 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566502463054 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0424403405 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331709095211 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139760692105 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070063122001 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212049038677 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613764662676 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.