The bar chart shows information about reasons why men and women make a trip
The bar chart compares between men and women in terms of reasons for making a trip.
It is clear that both men and women mostly travel for working and the mileages for day trip were lowest.
Men travel for working, learning other cultures and day trip more than women. Looking into the details, Men travel averagely 30000 miles for working as opposed to 25000 miles in women. The gap was narrowed in other categories with men traveling total 15000 miles to learn other cultures, compared with 12000 miles in the opposite gender. Additionally, the figures for day trips in men and women are 10000 miles and 8000 miles respectively.
Men are dominated by women in the other categories. It is noticeable that the mileage women go for shopping is 25000 and that in men is 23000. Besides, the figure for women traveling to visit family and friends is 25000 miles, followed by 21000 of men. Finally, There is a slight difference in the mileage for scenery, with 28000 in women and 26000 in men.
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 92
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Figures show that some countries have an ever increasing proportion of the population who are aged 15 or younger What do you think the current and future effects of this may be for those countries 67
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it 11
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74712643678 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33989225937 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7151775231 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.6 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261651907233 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146958428383 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11340494514 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226452168551 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141350466654 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.