Mobile phones and the Internet are very useful for old people. However, this section of population is the fewer users of mobile phones and the Internet. In what ways can mobile phones and the Internet be useful to the old people? How can the old people be encouraged to use this new technology?
It is apparent that the unfamiliarity to gadget devices and the Internet could culminate in many negative consequences in citizens especially senior ones.Given that the benefits associated with mobile phones and the Internet could be pronounced, many practical measures could be applied to encourage the new technology usage.
There are many advantages for old people when it comes to the usage of mobile phones and the Internet. First, many mobile phones have functions enabling senior users to keep contacts with many family members from far distances, thereby acting as an incentive for family bonding. Second, Thanks to social networks, old individuals could establish many friendships with other fellows from many places worldwide. This would promote social behaviours and strengthen social connections, thereby reducing mental disorders associated with solidarity.
Additionally, younger generations and official authorities should undertake practical and progressive initiatives to tackle this issue. First, young individuals instruct older ones how to use mobile phones and the Internet thoroughly. In fact, due to some obstacles related to health stemming from the ageing process, senior people have so desire for using electric devices and the Internet without proper assistance from younger ones. In addition, governments incentivise mobile manufacturers to have many distinctive features to support old people. For example, mobile phones with large screens and keyboards with giant letters could encourage the desire for using in old people, contributing remarkably to an increase in gadget device usage in old population.
In conclusion, the advantages of mobile phones and the Internet among old generations could be pronounced. By dint of proper assistance from younger ones and the application of features supporting elder people in mobile phones, usage of these technologies could witness a massive growth among this population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-01 | grahamoneil | 73 | view |
- Some groups of people have benefited from the modern communications technology but some people have not benefited at all Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages 56
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical day in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 73
- With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the Internet What potential problems may this trend lead to What solutions can you suggest to deal with it 90
- Nowadays most large companies operate multinationally To what extent those companies should have responsibility towards local communities in which they operate 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Given
...nces in citizens especially senior ones.Given that the benefits associated with mobil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84265734266 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89491274995 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541958041958 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1789236129 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.25 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386853303141 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166701600665 0.084324248473 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125404834143 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24942909168 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641143951966 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.