Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more.
Do you agree or disagree.
Recent decades have witnessed an increase in the imported labour proportions, raising many questions of workers’ safety. Although the proposal that skilled workers should stay in their own developing country sounds reasonable, i think that developed countries need them more.
Workers with professional competence could gain many benefits when moving to affluent countries. First, Expatriates in developed countries means better career prospects. This means that they could easily find a job with high remuneration and many benefits in kind, improving their living standards. Second, Working in developed nations is invariably associated with a liberty from the rigid laws and harsh social norms from the home country. For example, many homosexual individuals in Russia have a propensity to work in other European countries because sodomy means capital punishment.
Third-world countries could benefit from allowing their skilled workers to work in other prosperous nations. First, Many skilled labourers from poor countries would be conducive to increase in the national incomes of the host country. This could be implied that this rich country would conduct some outsourcing investments in the poor country such as the establishment of educational institutions with professional training courses or medical institutions with skilled medical personnel, which promote the locals’ living standards. In addition, Sending the workers with high competence could act as an incentive for an improvement in the diplomatic relationship between the poor and the affluent countries. For instance, As many skillful Vietnamese have promoted the working productivity in the United States , Vietnam now has been the top priority when American conducts financial assistance programmes.
In conclusion, I believe that third-world countries should send their professional workers to some developed countries for some advantages in terms of living standard improvement and economic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-30 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree? 86
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 92
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n developing country sounds reasonable, i think that developed countries need the...
^
Line 5, column 814, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...orking productivity in the United States , Vietnam now has been the top priority w...
^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rammes. In conclusion, I believe that third-world countries should send their ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, third, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98251748252 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01611369325 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2800478587 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.615384615 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299560103563 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109178681746 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777453649859 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186635099257 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693742844773 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.