The bar chart shows the monthly spending in dollars of a family in the USA on three items in 2010.

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the monthly spending in dollars of a family in the USA on three items in 2010.

<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The bar chart illustrates the monthly expenditures of an American household in 2010. Units are measured in dollars.
Overall, there was a downward trend of monthly spending of the American family over the period given. At the start of the period, food constituted a largest amount of money spent, followed by gas and clothing, respectively. In contrast, at the end of the period, clothing spending made up the largest number of expenditures, followed by gas and food.
To begin with, the expenditure on food has experienced a drop during the given period. Specifically, the spending on food stood at 500 at the beginning of the period, after which there was a fluctuation in the food expenditure before reaching a low of roughly 300 in the final month.
Conversely, the pattern for gas and clothing was almost similar during the period given in which the expenditures on both gas and clothing have seen a dramatic rise. Indeed, the expenditure on gas was at about 300 at the beginning of the period, after which this figure has seen a significant oscillation before peaking at a high of almost 400 in the final mongth. Similarly, clothing spending was at approximately 200 in January, after that it has witnessed a considerable vacillation before reaching a peak of more or less 700 in the final month. </span><br>

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-23 ngn999 67 view
2017-03-01 mabick_1527 84 view
2017-03-01 mabick_1527 79 view
Essays by user ngn999 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...e start of the period, food constituted a largest amount of money spent, followed...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, similarly, in contrast, more or less, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08035714286 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28100399952 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504464285714 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7704638545 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1057963408 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502776000437 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617660996481 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797379824978 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463770461099 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.