The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe in 2005, 2009 and 2015, compared with the European average.
The given bar chart illustrates the figure for cars per thousand individuals in five European nations from 2005 to 2015.
It can clearly be seen that Germany reached the highest point of cars in 2015 while Greece experienced the lowest figure in 2005 and 2015.
Looking at the information in more detail, in Greece, there was a similar figure of cars per thousand people was recorded in the years 2005 and 2015, which made up about 300 cars. In Italy, the number of cars per 1,000 individuals in 2009 reached around 550 marks, with those in 2015 and 2005 not far behind (approximately 540 and 500, respectively). In addition, the number of cars per thousand people was roughly 680 which reached the highest point in the year 2005, compared to about 600 cars in 2009 and just over 590 cars in 2015.
As illustrated, there was a similar figure for cars per thousand French population among three years, which accounted for roughly 700 cars. Specifically, in Germany, the number of cars per thousand people witnessed significantly upward movement to about 990 in 2015 after saw a slight decrease to 880 in 2009. As a whole, European countries had an equal average number of cars per 1,000 individuals in the years 2005 and 2009, while they experienced a considerable increase to nearly 800 cars in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-19 | hthngn | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | quynhan1995 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | quynhan1995 | 73 | view |
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- With the development of online communication, people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59490098291 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515555555556 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.8746727726 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 135.375 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402372515281 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198707326742 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792431511755 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251856487894 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732255785004 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.