The bar chart shows the number of volunteers in New Zealand who helped in sports organizations in 2010 The pie chart illustrates the number of volunteers doing different types of jobs for that same periods

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the number of volunteers in New Zealand who helped in sports organizations in 2010. The pie chart illustrates the number of volunteers doing different types of jobs for that same periods.

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of helpers in New Zealand supporting in sports groups during 2010. The pie chart provides information about the quantity of helpers in terms of five different kinds of jobs in the same time.
Overall, couple and dependent children tend to take part in volunteering in preference to others. They often support for coach, instructor or teacher.
In 2010, the number of volunteers of couple and dependent children reached a peak at 49.8% and was nearly double compared to couple with no dependent children. Whereas, the figure of one parent/lone person and other households were equivalent, were 10.9% and 12.4%.
In term of five different types of jobs, most volunteers have a tendency to help coach, instructor or teacher and its figure was 206,000. On contrast, the number of helpers for medical support or other was 62,700 and less than its figure for referee or umpire was 35,600. The quantity of volunteers for scorer or timekeeper and committee member or administrator were same.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-31 akorn99 89 view
2021-11-17 akorn99 84 view
2020-03-16 nguyenthao120199 77 view
2019-10-22 Mtr6510 57 view
2019-10-22 Mtr6510 44 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13095238095 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74386039027 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7445110165 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300523718286 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110351937847 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769866750627 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159830609587 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094808882319 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.