The given bar chart compares the proportion of elderly people of the total population among 3 different nations, namely Canada, Germany, and the UK from 1980 to 2030.
Overall, it can be seen that there was an upward trend regarding the portion of citizens aged 65 and over of the total number of people in both 3 surveyed countries over a period of 5 decades. Meanwhile, Germany was the leading country in terms of the proportion of the elderly.
In 1980, 15% of the total German population were dwellers aged over 65 years old, which was relatively higher than that of Canada and the UK with the figures were 14% and 10%, respectively. After 20 years, Germany still dominated first place with one-fifth of the population being the old generation. In contrast, the gap between Canada and the UK regarding the proportion of older citizens disappeared, also reaching a threshold of 15%.
At the end of the period, the ratio between the old and the young in Canada was 22%, which surpassed the UK to rank the second position. Besides, the proportion of elderly people in Germany continued to rise, reaching a peak of 25%, which was the highest recorded figure according to the chart.
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 78
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 67
- One of the most important issues facing the world today is a shortage of food and some think genetically modified foods are a possible solution To what extent do you agree or disagree
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, regarding, second, so, still, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78048780488 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60235558876 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551219512195 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8243359592 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0906241499896 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425379888272 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430594545061 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669386790893 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046141209468 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.