The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares the proportion of young people in 4 countries who studying higher education in three different years: 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, the participation rate of young generations entering higher education was on the increase, except for country B. It is worth noticing that the ratio in country D was far more popular compared to the rest.
In 2000, country D recorded the highest ratio of young students entering higher education, followed closely by country C, with 60% and 50% respectively. Both country B and A shared a fair pattern, with 40% and 38% noted. 5 years later, three countries are A, C, D experienced an upward trend of students choosing further education, for 48%, 52%, and 63% being recorded. In the contrary, the rate in country B decreased to 39% in 2005.
After a period of 10 years, 80% of young pupils studying further education was dominated by country D. The growth pattern carried on for country A, with the figure stood at 58%. There was no significant change for country C since 2005 as the rate stayed unchanged. Lastly, country B again underwent the same figure in the time frame, with 40% being recorded again.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 95
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, lastly, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89690721649 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70024384534 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6295708486 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3636363636 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118758534824 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557637074002 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799756381082 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11202046997 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989293111738 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.