The bar chart shows the percentages of households with cars in a European countries between 1971 and 2001. summarise the information by reporting main features and make comparisons where possible.
The above bar graph predicts the percentages of personal vehicles in houses in European nations from 1971 to 2001. Overall, the households' percentages with the number of 1 or more than 2 cars increased between 30 years while homes with no cars decreased.
The residents with no own transport were 47 percent in 1971 the highest and in successive years decreased by almost 5 percent and lowest in 2001 with about 25 percent of peoples. The individuals with one car houses culminated during this period, in 1971 the percentage was 35 per, and after 10 years it increased to 41 percent. But during the third-decade, the percentage lessened slightly to 37percent and peaked in 2001 with almost 50 percent.
The households with more than 2 vehicles were lowest in 1971 25percent and slightly climbed 30 percent in 1981, and minor downfall occurs in 1991 and brought it to the previous level. The most rose of all time was 35 percent in 2001.
From 1971 to 2001 Europeans dependence on personal transport systems rose than on public transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-12 | Farwa Nasir | 73 | view |
- Some people say that advertisement targeting children may have negative effects on them and suggest banning such advertisement as a solution To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people think that it s best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue to it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The restoration of older buildings in major cities throughout the world involve enormous expenditures This money would bring more benefits if it was used to provide new housing and road development To what extend do you agree or not 56
- The chart below shows the male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by reporting main feature and make comparison where possible 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91525423729 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68378827873 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.993711408 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232901512102 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112248099326 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500983148955 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151372924588 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778821994402 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91525423729 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68378827873 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.993711408 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232901512102 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112248099326 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500983148955 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151372924588 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778821994402 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.