The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011.
The supplied chart illustrates the British industrial personnel distribution in various fields in two particular years : 1841 and 2011.
Overall, with 36%, manufacturing made up the biggest percentage of employees of the UK in 1841, whereas in 170 years later, services accounted for the dominated proportion of 81%.
Regarding to the transferral of workforce sharing, there was an upward tendency in the percentage of workers working in services and construction. Specifically, from 33%, employee proportion of services increased by 48%, making up a massive gap. that of construction in 1841 was 3% less than in 2011.
On the contrary, downward trend was observed in the distribution of workers in the other industries, namely manufacturing, agriculture/fishing and energy/water. According to the chart, the figures of manufacturing declined by three fourth of that in 2011. Both of the data belonging to agriculture/fishing and energy/water ended at 1% in the second year of the survey. Interestingly, the proportion of personnel in energy/water industry always bottomed the chart, staying at 3% and 1% in 1841 and 2011 respectively.
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011. 78
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000 78
- Some people think that employers should ensure a supportive and pleasant work environment where each employee is respected and valued equally while others think employers should focus instead on providing better facilities and equipment 76
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 96
- Some people think that employers should ensure a supportive and pleasant work environment where each employee is respected and valued equally while others think employers should focus instead on providing better facilities and equipment. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...reased by 48%, making up a massive gap. that of construction in 1841 was 3% less tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6091954023 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64702170914 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5496449122 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.444444444 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234978406886 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951396494252 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745866913957 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136873317609 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335187330816 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.