The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different
seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main
features and make comparisons where relevant.
<p style="border: 0px; font-family: "Open Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); white-space: normal;">The chart compares the points scored by three different teams over a four-year period from 2002 to 2005.</p><p style="border: 0px; font-family: "Open Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); white-space: normal;">Overall, it is clear that there was a fluctuation in the scores of all the teams during the period shown. Also, the points scored by team B were significantly higher than the scores of the other teams.</p><p style="border: 0px; font-family: "Open Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); white-space: normal;">In 2002, team B achieved its highest total, 82 points. In contrast, the figures for team A and team C were noticeably lower than the scores of team B, which were 5 and 10 points, respectively. The period between 2002 and 2004 witnessed a dramatic increase in the scores of team A, reaching a peak of 35 points in 2004. The totals of team C remained relatively stable at between 10 and 15 points, whereas the scores of team B fell steadily from their peak in 2002 to a low figure of 43 points in 2004.</p><p style="border: 0px; font-family: "Open Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); white-space: normal;">There was then a rise in the team B score to 55 points in 2005. On the other hand, team A saw a fall in its score to 8 points, slightly higher than team C with 5 points.</p>
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Many people today especially in the developed world are choosing to have fewer children or none at all Why is this happening and do you think it is a good trend 68
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 11
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 965.302439024 166% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8503649635 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.0373492717 2.65546596893 152% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43795620438 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.4926829268 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 205.322307604 43.030603864 477% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 267.166666667 112.824112599 237% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.6666666667 22.9334400587 199% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0999191240299 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783720146911 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0205424903556 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999191240299 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.0 13.2329268293 219% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.54 11.4140731707 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 32.0 11.4329268293 280% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.9970731707 182% => OK
text_standard: 29.0 11.0658536585 262% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.