Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar chart compares the rate of consumers eating fruit and vegetable in daily meals in the year of 2002, 2006, and 2010.
Overall, in 2006, people who consumed fruit and vegetable were observed the highest rate during the surveyed period, while in 2002, there was among the least rate of consumed healthy food.
A glance at the bar chart given reveals that in 2002, the percentage of UK men who digested fruit and vegetable was 22%, which was 3% lower than that of women, at 25%. The bottom position belonged to children, at 11% in the same year. The similarity in 2010, the rate of women eating fruit and vegetable hold the first rank, at 26%, followed by men, at 24%, and children accounted for 16%.
A striking feature was the percentage of fruit and vegetable consumers in 2006. Women showed their interest in vegetable and fruit rather than the other groups,as a result, they took the lead at 32%. In contrast, men and children showed less favored in vegetable than women, only at 26% and 18%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. 89
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. 73
- “Crime is a big problem in the world; many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.” 84
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om position belonged to children, at 11% in the same year. The similarity in 2010...
^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...e and fruit rather than the other groups,as a result, they took the lead at 32%. In...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70391061453 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34248148339 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.283425258 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358466984393 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171587991142 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128621613772 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246177045631 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749518787346 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.