The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The bar chart gives data about pupils who could master a second language and the different countries from which they came.
Overall, as can be explicitly seen from the chart, Romanian, Indian, and Vietnamese students were quite avid language learners while Chinese, Thai, and Russian accounted for less significant parts. Meanwhile, the proportions of girls outnumbered those of boys when it comes to learning a second language.
In Romania, India, and Vietnam, the ratios of male students mastering two languages were about 42%, 55%, and 46%. In the meantime, almost 70% of Indian girls knew a second language while their Romanian and Vietnamese counterparts only accounted for circa 65% and 56% respectively.
On the other hand, Chinese girls took up about 30% of the posse, twice as many as their male compatriots. The chasm between female and male students learning a language that was not their mother tongue was approximately 10% in Russia. At the same time, Thailand was a unique country as the number of boys getting engaged in a second language exceeded that of girls by about 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | stanie calitex | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-05 | sanjay marwaha | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | Jonkun | 60 | view |
- some people say that cellphones have improved humans life Others believe that cell phones have caused problems 84
- Although sports events are very popular violence at these events is on the increase Why is this so What should authorities do to prevent violence from taking place at sports events 89
- Sample topic Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should wr 78
- One of the major problems facing the world today is the growing number of refugees The developed nations in the world should tackle this problem by taking more refugees To what extent do you agree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10555555556 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63389000211 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2011485709 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138790099812 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628876996428 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548911499941 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962483972432 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553894399406 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.