The bar chart demonstrates how much time the teacher used to teach their students in different standards of schools in four particular countries in 2001.
Overall, what the graph implies is that the higher the school level in each country, the longer the teaching hours. Among the four countries, the USA's teachers spent more time teaching their students, while the Japanese teachers had been passed less time to teach than all others.
To begin with, in 2001 the US's primary teachers taught around 150 hours more compared with the rest of the three countries. Japan and Iceland utilized 600 and approximately 595 hours respectively, while Spain used 650 hours in the whole year to instruct their pupils. Moreover, the teachers of the USA gave 1000 hours to the lower secondary pupils. In the case of the other three countries the range between 600 to 750 hours.
Turning to upper secondary, Japanese teachers gave the least amount of time among the four countries which were 700 hours. On the other hand, almost 1200 hours the scholars had been got from their instructors in the USA in 2001. Spain and Iceland had spent around 900 hours on this purpose.
- Topic More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicine Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree 89
- In many countries a small number of people can earn extremely high salaries some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that government should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 89
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8883248731 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33863107175 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334935164615 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119556462058 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967169626799 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216093481275 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106492666048 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.