The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015
The bar graph compares the proportion of both genders who were having jobs in Canada, South Korea and Sweden for the year 2005 and a decade later.
Overall, it can be manifested that more men had job compared to women in all the countries. Notably, there was also an increase for all the data except for males of Sweden.
First of all, in 2005, the highest proportion of employment rates were for Swedish men and women with figures of 78% and 45% respectively. Whereas, almost two out of three men in Canada had jobs, which was the least and the figures for female were 38%. Following this, in the next decade, figures of men in Sweden and Canada were exactly the same (70%), where the former one had alleviated by 8% and the latter one augmented by the same proportion.
Secondly, the employment figures in South Korea were the second highest for men in 2005 which further rose and became the highest in 2015 with figures rising from three quarters to 78% during the decade. Even though the employment figures for females had a rise, it still remained the lowest with figures of 30% and
35%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-17 | Kelly33 | 67 | view |
2022-09-15 | Nguyễn Ninh | 56 | view |
2021-11-10 | phg_phg | 67 | view |
2021-11-04 | viviene | 69 | view |
2021-10-16 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows how sports shoes are made 79
- the table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006 79
- Should government or teachers be responsible for what is to be taught in schools 73
- Should government or teachers be responsible for what is to be taught in schools 61
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wedish men and women with figures of 78% and 45% respectively. Whereas, almost tw...
^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...obs, which was the least and the figures for female were 38%. Following this, in ...
^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ained the lowest with figures of 30% and 35%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, except for, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62244897959 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26833773976 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5541814984 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164123851926 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784516330269 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548404836272 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975107990627 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325529007581 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.