The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
This university report is going to show global video game sales from 2000 to 2006, it will show the data for mobile games, console games, handheld games and finally online games
across the entire chart, it is clear that handheld games were the dominate form of gaming sales wise, and only continued to increase as time passed
as for both mobile and internet based games, both did not exist in 2000, but online games started first, with nearly 1 billion dollars in sales, continuing down to 2001, the start of mobile gaming in 2002 with 1 billion dollars, equal to sales of online games in 2002, this pattern of increase would continue, with advancements in technology boosting the sales of phone games a bit more than online games in 2003, with both getting closer in sales in 2004, another sales boost in 2005 for mobile games before a massive boost in sales from online games
as for console games, it is the only type of video game that has seen a reduction of sales across the years, going from near 6 billion dollars in 2000 all the way down to nearly 3.5 billion in 2006
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What effects will this have on society 56
- Many feel that being fully present in the moment is more valuable than thinking of the future in terms of both nations and their residents In my opinion this claim is untrue and shortsighted Firstly countries must look to the future to ensure the safe flo
- In your opinion should young people choose their profession or should their parents choose for them 67
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 84
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t, it is clear that handheld games were the dominate form of gaming sales wise, and only con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57948717949 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04398702827 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 195.0 22.4926829268 867% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 893.0 112.824112599 791% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 195.0 22.9334400587 850% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 31.0 5.23603664747 592% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312592759647 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.312592759647 0.103423049105 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206893003857 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652316451875 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 97.6 13.2329268293 738% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -109.53 61.2550243902 -179% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 77.0 10.3012195122 747% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.47 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.06 8.06136585366 199% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.0 10.9970731707 727% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 52.0 11.0658536585 470% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.