The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar chart below comprises the proportions of the household prices in Algeria, China, and Argentina from the period 2007 to 2010.
According to the chart, there was a notable rise in property prices in China, while Algeria fell sharply and only Argentina showed a fluctuation. In addition, The prices of households in China replaced the figure for Algeria in 2010.
Households prices in Algeria kept the highest point at 6.0% and followed by Argentina and China respectively to 3.0% and 2.0% in 2007. Moreover, there was a major decline in property prices in Algeria to 3.0% in the next 3 years.
On the other hand, China witnessed a tremendous change in property prices which increased significantly to over 6.0%, and became the nation that had the most expensive household prices above all in 2010. Similarly, Argentina's household prices showed an upward trend of 2.0% in 2008. However, This figure decreased moderately to 1.0 % in the next year, then recovered to over 2.0% in the last year.
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 61
- families who send their kids to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- more and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How these problems can be solved 56
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aimed at children should be banned because of the negative effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...placed the figure for Algeria in 2010. Households prices in Algeria kept the hi...
^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by Argentina and China respectively to 3.0% and 2.0% in 2007. Moreover, there w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, similarly, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0119760479 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6703776793 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6662979333 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19788038097 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984851231363 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442631999616 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138608493035 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183742199618 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.