Below is a chart showing how many hours per week the average person spent on various kinds of media, including watching TV, surfing on the Internet, listening to the radio, and reading printed material. The years covered are from 1990 to 2005.
The graph provides information about how many average hours that people used to enjoy in a variety media sources between 1990 to 2005.
Overall, it can clearly be seen from the line graph that there was an increase in the number of hours using Internet and radio, whereas hours spent on television and printed material decreased significantly over the time period shown.
Looking at the spending on Internet for more details, it is evident that Internet using started at 0 hours. This figure remained unchanged and rose slightly to 1 hours in 1995. From 1995 until the end of the period, the average number of hours which people spent on Internet went up gradually to approximately 15 hours. Next, the average hours using radio stood at about 4 hours in 1990, fluctuated around 4 hours in the period of 10 years and experienced 5 hours in 2005.
Turning to the amount of time that people wasted on television, it can be seen that reached a peak of 25 hours, which was the highest point on the chart. Subsequently, this figure dropped gradually to about 17 hours in 2005. In 1990, people spent 6 hours on reading printed material. 5 years later, the average number of hours went down under 5 hours in 2000. From 200 until 2005, this figure continued falling to 3 hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-29 | AnhNguyen752002 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | Hoang Minh | 73 | view |
- The government should regulate new developments and the authorities have a responsibility to protect important heritage buildings in Vietnam Do you agree 56
- Below is a chart showing how many hours per week the average person spent on various kinds of media including watching TV surfing on the Internet listening to the radio and reading printed material The years covered are from 1990 to 2005 73
- adaptation when living in new country 73
- the percentage of illiterate people 56
- government and private spending on healthcare 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y media sources between 1990 to 2005. Overall, it can clearly be seen from the...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nificantly over the time period shown. Looking at the spending on Internet for ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years and experienced 5 hours in 2005. Turning to the amount of time that peopl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70535714286 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44295569455 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526785714286 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2327910685 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8181818182 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276310400835 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115680256731 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068711429496 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1815311357 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126288179219 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.