Some people think the world would be better if we all spoke the same language. Do you
agree or disagree?
In the modern era, language has been seen not only as a method which helps people to communicate, but also an interesting aspect of the culture of each country to discover. However, a lot of residents find it difficult to learn a foreign language, so they prefer having similar conversations all over the world to the variety of tongues. From my point of view, I partially disagree with the opinion that every country speaks the same language. In this essay, I will give some arguments to support my opinion.
From an overall perspective, there are two main reasons why I believe that it is essential for a country to conserve its own voice. It is a valid point that language is the beauty of the traditions which have been maintained for thousands of years. To illustrate, it depicts the value of history and the country’s customs. That is because through daily speaking, residents are enabled to understand the enhancement of a culture and the survival of a country via wars. Besides that, each tongue has the function of representing how it was affected by the dynasties which dominated in that country during a specific period as well as providing information about the process of language formation. In addition, having their own speech is a critical key to control the country’s policy. A good illustration of this is citizens must be capable of educating themselves about their language in order to make a decision whenever the government gives them any official documents. As a consequence, they are able to distinguish between right and wrong and have the ability to fight for the truth if the leaders make unfortunate mistakes. Moreover, if dwellers study their native language which people from another country can not understand, the secrets in the state apparatus will be safe.
On the other hand, there are several arguments against the idea that it is not vital to have various languages of countries in the world. First and foremost, it is considered to be easier if humans can hold a conversation in the same language. This results in the development of multinational corporations. To elaborate, the managers of this kind of economy can facilitate their tasks as well as their projects when they negotiate with other bosses from foreign companies. This results in assisting the owners to achieve the highest ambition for each purchase contract. Secondly, some students who are not excellent at learning a second language, having the same voice will be the best happiness of their study procedure. It is a fact that a number of students find it difficult to get used to other languages but not their mother tongue. This has led to their results in some exams being lower than what they expect, which prevents them from enrolling in a good school or university.
In conclusion, having problems with language has been a complex issue which will continue to demand our attention for the foreseeable future. Although it is more convenient for people to communicate if we speak in the same tongue, I believe it results in the lack of traditions of a country and the adverse impacts on the government, which is not expected to happen. Each language has its own beauty and it is the symbol for each country. That is why they should be protected and continue improving in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-05 | vishal sachdeva | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | thaokim2003 | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-03 | quytnee | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | Gaurav Das | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Thu Ngân | 73 | view |
- Coal consumption by sectors in the UK in million tonnes 75
- the percentage of illiterate people 56
- adaptation when living in new country 73
- the adverse impacts of globalization on the cultural identity erosion 73
- Below is a chart showing how many hours per week the average person spent on various kinds of media including watching TV surfing on the Internet listening to the radio and reading printed material The years covered are from 1990 to 2005 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g a specific period as well as providing information about the process of languag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 41.998997996 190% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2745.0 1615.20841683 170% => OK
No of words: 560.0 315.596192385 177% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90178571429 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79060411041 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 176.041082164 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 857.7 506.74238477 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1302825163 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148673317853 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409074079299 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033404011234 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991335876736 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021573703384 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.