The tables show the sales of fair-priced coffee from developing countries and bananas in Switzerland, UK, Belgium, Sweden and Denmark in the years 1999 and 2004.
Overall, the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas have shown a dramatic increase in all five European countries over the period. Meanwhile, the sale of bananas has suffered a slight decrease in Sweden and Denmark.
It is observed that the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee has sky-rocketed in the UK, from 1.5 million of euros in 1999 to a surprising 20 million of euros in 2004. Similarly, the sales has nearly doubled in Belgium and Sweden where they were 1 and 0.8 million of euros respectively in 1999. A similar trend was observed in Switzerland and Denmark where the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee showed a significant increase from 3 and 1.8 million of euros to 6 and 2 million of euros over the period.
In addition to this, in Switzerland, the sale of bananas has leaped from 15 million euros in 1999 to 47 million euros in 2004. Likewise, greater increase in sales of bananas was seen in UK and Belgium where it rose from a mere 1 and 0.6 to 5.5 and 4 million of euros respectively. On the contrary, Sweden and Denmark have suffered the greatest decline in sales of bananas from 1.8 and 2 to a mere 1 and 0.9 million of euros respectively.
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledg 78
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing task 1 The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 80
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the informastion by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant write at least 150 words 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, similarly, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76293103448 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07776429022 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396551724138 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9088207163 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.777777778 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217808428861 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123831392754 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696242493643 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179464044834 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631700308043 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.