The two plans illustrated the upgrades in interior design of city hospital in 2010 compared to what it was 3 years ago in 2007.
At the first glance, it is clear that the hospital’s main building was still located at the same spot. However, on its East wing, a brand new public parking area was added, separating staff and public car parks. The old parking was reserved for staffs’ vehicles only.
Next, some significant improvements have been done to assist the traffic problem in front of the hospital on Hospital Road. Not one but two roundabout were built in 2010, with one situated at the South Hospital gate right next to the staff entrance from their private parking lot and the other one is at the junction betweent Hospital and City Road. Mini bus stops used to exist along Hospital Road also conspicuously disappeared, instead a grander bus station with paths connected to both roundabouts was constructed in the Southwest corner of the hospistal, opposite the staff parking area.
To conclude, tremendous upgrades were added to the map of City Hospistal which is good to dissolve the traffic problem in the area.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 92
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 95
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- CAMBRIDGE 13 TEST 1 WRITING TASK 1 The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 89
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93229166667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59326363412 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630208333333 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4977296568 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164840724381 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702771294332 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551551846291 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101024555692 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056659743223 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.