The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began.
The bar chart compares the total number of males and females who have been entered in the Olympics. The line graph represents the overall number of participants of the game between 1924 to 2012.
Overall, it is seen clearly that the total number of both, males and females players have been increased over time, whereas males were at the top position in this list.
To comments with, nearly 3000 male athletes have taken part in the Olympics in 1924, which was around 2900 times higher than females ones. Between 1952 to 2012, the number players of both gender increased drastically, male and female players accounted for around 6000 and 5000 respectively in 2012.
Furthermore, the line chart shows that the overall trend of total participants in the Olympics has been increased, which was at nearly 3000 players in 1924. It was rose to over 6000 players from 3000 in the following time. Surprisingly, it was inclined over 10000 players the first time since 1924 in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Minhchi2007 | view | |
| 2023-01-30 | vermaparmish | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-01 | trangthanthien25 | view | |
| 2022-10-22 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | WindOlivia | 61 | view |
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what action can be taken to solve this problem 78
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four di erent mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 81
- The maps provide a comparison of the town of Seatown and the changes it has witnessed from 1995 to the present day 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89156626506 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39719679521 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536144578313 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0059116899 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129211000736 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675889047224 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606798158356 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905476446976 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710363736956 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.