The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan.
The bar chart provide insights about total population of Japan starting from year 1950 to 2055 while the tabular data gives same information for above 65 years of age and their contribution in overall citizens. Units of population are measured in Millions.
Overall, the graph is on increasing trend except for last four decades where it shows small dip. Also the more number of humans survived in between 1985 and 2015. In the initial years citizens are very few and that count is never obtained back again. In future it is predicted the number of older people will be higher as compared to other humans generation.
Firstly with regards to the population it started at 84.1 millions in 1950 while the over 65 age population reaches 4.1 millions which accounted 4.9% of total living humans and it was constantly went up and reaches the high hit of 127.8 millions in 2010 before falling dramatically to about 110 and 89.9 million in 2035 and 2055 respectively. In the meanwhile the senior citizenship count is climbed up at steady rate and reaches 37.2 millions and accounted for 34% of total population.
Likewise, approximately 5% is getting went up consecutively from 1950 to 1965. In 1975 it suddenly jumped to about 111.9 millions in 1975 after which the figure follows 6% rise till 1995. In 2035 it much slumped to 110 millions and reaches second significant least value of 89.9millions. In the same time the elderly people rate decrease to 36.5 from 37.2 in the span of 20 years ranging between 1935 and 1955, which stands for 41% of total population.
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 89
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 84
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 61
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... four decades where it shows small dip. Also the more number of humans survived in b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e number of older people will be higher as compared to other humans generation. ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ple will be higher as compared to other humans generation. Firstly with regards to ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ignificant least value of 89.9millions. In the same time the elderly people rate d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, likewise, second, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85074626866 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5944188431 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578358208955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3415943863 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137289838145 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412841915566 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697982587014 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893810883896 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988707004938 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.