The chart and table below give information about what nursing graduates did after finishing their course in the UK in 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart compares the percentage of different sectors which graduated students in nursing major chose after university in the UK in 2009 and the table illustrates the proportion of nursing employees in different health departments.
It is clear that the majority of graduates chose to work in the health sector in 2009. Noticeably, the percentage of hospital nurses accounted for the highest figure among others.
In 2009, the proportion of graduated students working for health companies and hospitals took up 84%, followed by merely 8% for those who worked and studied simultaneously. Meanwhile, the figures for graduates joining in further education and being unclear were similar, at 2%, which was doubled that of those who were unemployed.
In addition, 72,9% of graduates working in the health sector was hospital nurses, compared to only 1,3% for paramedic. While the percentage of midwives was the second-highest in the table, at 12,4%, which was 12 times higher than those who were mental nurses (0,4%). At the same time, the figures for Community nurse and other were 10,3% and 2,7% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-23 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertiliser compost Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29775280899 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83284810844 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9737884162 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103100571739 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517509026027 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475334622124 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802448926701 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537245760654 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.