The chart and table below show customer satisfaction levels in the US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999 2000 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The charts give information on how people used flight facilities, including airlines and different kinds of aspects, had satisfaction between 1999 2007.

Firstly, the graph indicates that occupations which associated with national airlines were highly satisfied. In 1999, satisfactory performance sent 65% and then rose slightly to 72% in 2007, while the quantity of dissatisfied clients went down over the same period.

As is presented in table chart, the complaisance of passengers and staff acquired high levels of satisfaction over the time. In addition, there was a gradual increase in satisfaction in the case of ticket price, while schedules remained fairly stable over a period almost last-7 years. Interestingly, only 47% of travelers felt comfortable with seats provided by data in 2007.

Overall, what stands out from the charts reveal that the degree of satisfaction came up steadily and also specific ingredients of flying experience had a upward trend during the whole time.

Votes
Average: 4.7 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ic ingredients of flying experience had a upward trend during the whole time.
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52287581699 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95475442482 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.738562091503 0.547539520022 135% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5795076928 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190360918913 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812716741826 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474160894943 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104447595262 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047165949736 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.