The chart bellow shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1979 to 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparasion where relevant
The line graph compares the proportion of the income gap between genders in five countries from 1978 to 2008. Overall, there was a decrease in the percentage of difference in incomes of men and women for most of the period. However, after 1998, the percentage gap in gender incomes actually widened in Australia. It can be seen from the graph that in 1978, there was a difference of almost 50% between the incomes of men and women in Japan, compared with around 34% in the US. Both nations then saw a gradual reduction in these figures, so that by 2008 the proportion of gaps were over 40% and approximately 28%, respectively. There was also a fall in the incomes gap between genders in the UK and France. In those countries, the percentage of different income between men and women was lower than in Japan or the US. From figures of roughly 30% and just under 20% in the UK and France, respectively, the percentage decline was steady, to 27% in the UK and 18% in France in 2008. In contrast, in 1978, the lowest income gap was in Australia. While this remained at about 8% until 1998, it then grew dramatically to 24% at the end of the period, overtaking the figure for France.
- Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- People remember special gifts or presents that they have received. Why? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050. 56
- The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 657, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'incomes'' or 'income's'?
Suggestion: incomes'; income's
...pectively. There was also a fall in the incomes gap between genders in the UK and Franc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50934579439 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59895855167 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2428939775 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216834789567 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10171478013 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707584126678 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216834789567 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.