The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of student’s responses to a questionnaire about the range of books and non-printed material in their university library.
Overall, most postgraduates responded that the range of books was not good, the undergraduates were divided in their responses. The availability of non-printed materials such as computer software, online journals etc. was very good for undergraduates but half the postgraduates felt the library’s non-printed material was just satisfactory.
Most undergrads responded that the range of books available were very good or satisfactory, 39% and 29% accordingly. Only 32% of them were not happy with the range of books. 55% of them also answered that the non-printed materials at the university library was very good, followed by 33% being satisfied and only 12% were not happy of the computer software and journals collection at the library.
The responses given by postgraduates on the range is books indicate they were not good at all; it was steep at 65%. Only 15% felt that the collection was very good and 20% were just satisfied. On the non-printed material, nearly half of them were just satisfied with the other half of their responses was divided between not good at 25% and very good at 27%.
- You have recently noticed a lot of rubbish in the area where you live You decided to complain about this Write a letter to the environmental officer In your letter describe where the rubbish is coming from say what problems it is causing suggest what the 56
- Some people say that the only way to learn a second language well is to live in a country where that language is spoken What is your opinion about this 73
- You have recently noticed a lot of rubbish in the area where you live You decided to complain about this Write a letter to the environmental officer In your letter describe where the rubbish is coming from say what problems it is causing suggest what the 61
- younger than they are Is it a good thing or a bad thing 84
- Some people say that the only way to learn a second language well is to live in a country where that language is spoken What is your opinion about this 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20487804878 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09709618176 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0134762868 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.7 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111188814244 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573134474204 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664840971818 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101265339633 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726034339692 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.