The chart below give information about the high-speed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002.
The line chart provides information about households, which had internet connections in five countries. The tabular graph represents the percentage change in connections in the same five countries between 2001 to 2002. The data is in the number of connections per 1000 people.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given line graph and table that, the USA had the highest connection ratio by the end and the UK had the highest percentage change.
To comments with, as regards south Korea, accounted for 122 connection per 1000 people in the year 2001, which increased to 132.4 connections in the next year. Secondly, the initial figure for Germany, Switzerland, and Britain, comprised 3.4, 3.6 and 3.3 connection in the beginning, which inclined to 5.616, 7.82, and 10.89 connections respectively in the year 2002. Lastly, the ratio of connections for the USA was around 93 connections in 2001, which increased drastically to 251.1 in the one year period.
Furthermore, the percentage change in the overall connection for South Korea, accounted for the lowest with +20 among others, whereas Britain had the highest change with 230% in this list. Moreover, the proportion of The USA, Germany and Switzerland, comprised 170%, 80% and 120% respectively in this category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-23 | rajpatel90 | 69 | view |
| 2021-08-22 | maiphuong0610 | 74 | view |
| 2021-06-07 | kory | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Narges.s | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 92 | view |
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...me five countries between 2001 to 2002. The data is in the number of connections pe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25980392157 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8566741631 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53431372549 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6860290688 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204736201887 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101153842266 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924677381999 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131858678326 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134275864507 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.